Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

stubhub_trending

Read-only

List StubHub's currently-featured trending performers with follower counts and event date ranges.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "stubhub_trending"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
top_level_category_idNoOptional. Filter to one top-level vertical: 0 (all categories, default), 1 (Theater), 2 (Sports), 3 (Concerts).

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds that results carry follower counts and event date ranges, which is useful output context, but says nothing about pagination, result limits, or freshness beyond 'currently-featured'.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single tight sentence with no waste, front-loading the verb and resource. Nothing padded and nothing left dangling.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists and annotations cover read-only/open-world behavior, so the definition need only orient the agent. It does that adequately for a zero-required-param browse tool; only marginal detail (ordering, result count) is absent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the single parameter's enum values (0-3 categories) are fully documented in the schema. The description adds nothing about the filter, so the baseline of 3 applies with the schema doing all the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb (List) plus resource (trending performers) and even names the fields returned (follower counts, event date ranges). This distinguishes it from the sibling stubhub_trending_events, which covers events rather than performers, though no sibling is named explicitly in the text.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied: 'currently-featured trending' signals a no-query browse/discovery call. There is no explicit when-to-use, when-not, or pointer to alternatives such as stubhub_trending_events or stubhub_search, so guidance is only latent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources