Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

streeteasy_areas

Read-only

List StreetEasy's complete public area catalog with each location's ID and hierarchy. Use these IDs to search rental or sale listings by area.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "streeteasy_areas"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=true, so a safe, read-only, no-side-effect profile is established. The description adds that the catalog is "complete public" (i.e., unfiltered full dump), which is useful scoping context, but says nothing about size, caching, or rate limits beyond that.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two tight sentences with zero filler: what it returns first, why you'd call it second. Fully front-loaded and nothing redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return-value documentation is unnecessary, and with no parameters there is nothing else to specify. It could be a touch stronger by explicitly naming the rental/sale search tools that consume these IDs, but it is otherwise complete for a zero-arg catalog endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so the baseline is 4. The description correctly implies no filtering input is needed (it returns the whole catalog), matching the empty schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Specific verb ("List") plus a clearly bounded resource ("StreetEasy's complete public area catalog") and it names the returned payload (IDs and hierarchy). It is distinguishable from the streeteasy_* search tools, though it does not explicitly name a sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The second sentence states the downstream use case ("search rental or sale listings by area") which signals this is the ID-resolution prerequisite for streeteasy_rentals_search / streeteasy_sales_search. No explicit when-not-to-use or exclusions, so it falls short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources