Skip to main content
Glama

Crawlora MCP

stockx_releases

Read-only

Fetch a date-ordered StockX upcoming release or restock page with each product's published release date. Use stockx_search to query products or stockx_product for item details.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "stockx_releases"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
fromNoOnly include releases on or after this date (YYYY-MM-DD, UTC). Defaults to today.
pageNo1-indexed result page. Defaults to 1.
limitNoResults per page. Defaults to 20, maximum 100.

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataYesThe tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so safety is covered. The description adds that results are date-ordered and include each product's published release date, which is useful output context, but it doesn't describe pagination limits or freshness/live-update behavior beyond the schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, zero waste, with the core capability front-loaded and the routing guidance second. Every clause earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values needn't be explained, annotations cover safety, and all three params are documented. The definition is complete enough for correct invocation, though pagination behavior could add marginal value.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with 'from' (default today, UTC), 'page' (1-indexed), and 'limit' (default 20, max 100) all documented in the schema. The description adds no parameter semantics beyond what the schema already provides, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Fetch'), resource ('StockX upcoming release or restock page'), and scope ('date-ordered', 'each product's published release date'). This clearly separates it from stockx_search and stockx_product, both named.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes to alternatives: use stockx_search to query products, stockx_product for item details. This implies when this tool is preferred (getting the release/restock feed). It lacks an explicit 'do not use for X' exclusion, keeping it below a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources