Crawlora MCP

sofascore_player_tournaments

Read-only

Lists every competition a SofaScore player has played in, with id, name, slug, category, sport and gender, including cups and friendlies that sofascore_player_statistics_seasons leaves out. Use it by player id to find competitions for the player-events or search flows.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "sofascore_player_tournaments"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	Yes	Required. Numeric SofaScore player id, e.g. 855833.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes	The tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

AddedOct 7, 2026

TDQS

A3.9/5.0

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds scope context (comprehensive competition coverage including cups and friendlies) but doesn't address auth, rate limits, or result size/pagination. Consistent with the annotations, no contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences that front-load the primary function and put the sibling differentiation and usage hint second. The trailing 'or search flows' is slightly loose, but there is no padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values needn't be explained, yet the description still names them usefully. For a single-required-param read tool with annotations and an output schema, nothing essential for correct invocation is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, including a format hint and example ('Numeric SofaScore player id, e.g. 855833'). The description only restates 'by player id', adding no meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Lists every competition a SofaScore player has played in') and enumerates the returned fields, then explicitly contrasts with sibling sofascore_player_statistics_seasons, which is exactly what lets an agent tell the two apart. No ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Names the sibling it complements and the condition that differentiates it (cups and friendlies the other tool omits), and points to the player-events / search follow-ups. It stops short of stating when NOT to use it, and 'search flows' is left somewhat vague, so it is clear context rather than fully explicit routing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Crawlora MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?