Crawlora MCP

sofascore_event_odds

Read-only

Returns one match's betting markets and choices from SofaScore's credential-free public JSON. Returns 404 when SofaScore has no odds for the match. id: Required. Numeric SofaScore event (match) id, e.g. 14025013. Use draftkings_odds to retrieve draftKings Sportsbook odds.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>"
    },
    "name": "sofascore_event_odds"
  }
}

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`id`	Yes	Required. Numeric SofaScore event (match) id, e.g. 14025013.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`data`	Yes	The tool result payload (shape varies per tool; see each tool's docs resource).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

First observedOct 5, 2026

TDQS

A4.1/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint, but the description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond them: the data is credential-free/public and returns 404 when SofaScore has no odds, which is exactly the kind of error behavior an agent needs. It does not describe rate limits or response shape, so not a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loaded with the core purpose, then follows with 404 behavior, parameter restatement, and the alternative tool. Every sentence is purposeful, though the id sentence duplicates the schema and could be trimmed.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists so return values needn't be explained, and the description covers source, credentials, 404 behavior, and sibling routing. Complete enough for correct invocation, with only minor gaps around edge cases like non-numeric ids.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents the single id parameter including the example. The description merely repeats the same id text, adding no new syntax or format detail. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (Returns) and resource (one match's betting markets and choices), names the data source (SofaScore credential-free public JSON), and distinguishes itself from the sibling draftkings_odds. An agent can tell exactly what this retrieves without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes to an alternative source (draftkings_odds) for DraftKings odds, giving a clear source-selection signal. It does not state an explicit when-to-use/when-not condition beyond the source distinction, nor prerequisites, so it falls just short of a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Crawlora MCP tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?