Skip to main content
Glama

Learn the voice from published posts

learn_voice_from_published

Fills the brand kit's example posts from what this workspace has already published. Use it when the brand kit has no examples and there is a publishing history, instead of asking the user to paste posts they have already sent.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "learn_voice_from_published"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoHow many to take, up to 10. Defaults to 5.
platformNoTake examples from one platform only.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A4.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare it is a non-read-only, non-destructive mutation. The description adds useful context about what it mutates (brand kit examples) and where data comes from, but does not specify whether existing examples are overwritten or appended, which is relevant given idempotentHint=false.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, each earning its place. The action is front-loaded, followed by clear usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple 2-parameter tool with no output schema and clear annotations, the description is nearly complete. Minor gap: it doesn't state what happens if publishing history is empty or if examples already exist, but the usage guideline implies it is for when no examples exist.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents both parameters. The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb (fills) and resource (brand kit's example posts) with the data source (already published posts). It does not name a sibling tool, but the action is distinct enough that an agent can tell it apart from update_brand_kit or scrape_posts.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states when to use (brand kit has no examples and there is a publishing history) and what alternative to avoid (asking the user to paste posts they have already sent). This leaves no ambiguity.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources