Skip to main content
Glama

Andrii Co. Notary & Apostille Assistant

get_price_quote

Read-only

Calculate a server-authoritative USD price estimate before shipping — pure, no side effects, nothing booked. Use when the customer asks about cost. Accepts: document_count, mobile, after_hours, apostille plus tier (e.g. expedited, priority, standard, mailin); set needs_notarization false for already-certified records; ua_lane (withinUkraine | fromUsa) prices the Ukraine direct lane, translation_docs the in-Ukraine translation. Returns amountCents and line items; fails if apostille is true and tier is invalid (with apostille false, tier is ignored).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tierNoApostille tier when `apostille`: expedited | priority | standard | mailin.
mobileNoTrue if we travel to the customer (adds the flat travel fee).
ua_laneNoUkraine delivery lane: withinUkraine (weekly batch, included) or fromUsa (direct: NP postage estimate + the $25 dispatch fee).
apostilleNoTrue to include a Secretary-of-State apostille.
after_hoursNoMobile only: the chosen slot is after 6pm or on a weekend.
document_countNoNumber of documents (1–20). Default 1.
translation_docsNoApostille documents translated in Ukraine ($20/doc; the first doc is free on the direct lane).
needs_notarizationNoSet false for a mail-in apostille of already-certified public records (birth/marriage/death certificates) that need no notarial act.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
currencyYes
lineItemsYes
amountCentsYes
howToProceedYes
prepaymentRequiredYes

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / translation_docs
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Apostille documents translated in Ukraine ($20/doc; the first doc is\nfree on the direct lane).",
      +  "format": "int64",
      +  "type": [
      +    "integer",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
    • addedInput schema / properties / ua_lane
      Added value: +{
      +  "default": null,
      +  "description": "Ukraine delivery lane: withinUkraine (weekly batch, included) or\nfromUsa (direct: NP postage estimate + the $25 dispatch fee).",
      +  "type": [
      +    "string",
      +    "null"
      +  ]
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "amountCents": {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    },
      +    "currency": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "howToProceed": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "lineItems": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "amountCents": {
      +            "type": "integer"
      +          },
      +          "label": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "required": [
      +          "label",
      +          "amountCents"
      +        ],
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "prepaymentRequired": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "currency",
      +    "amountCents",
      +    "lineItems",
      +    "prepaymentRequired",
      +    "howToProceed"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint/destructiveHint=false, and the description reinforces this with 'pure, no side effects, nothing booked'. Beyond that it discloses a genuine error mode ('fails if `apostille` is true and `tier` is invalid') and the tier-ignored-when-apostille-false rule, which annotations cannot convey.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three dense sentences, front-loaded with purpose and safety, then parameters, then return/failure behavior. Efficient and well ordered, though the parameter sentence is long and list-like.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With annotations covering safety and an output schema covering amountCents/line items, the description fills the remaining gaps: parameter interactions and failure conditions. The only omission is how it relates to request_price_match, a meaningful ambiguity given the sibling set.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline would be 3, but the description adds cross-parameter semantics the schema lacks: tier examples, the ua_lane choice and its pricing effect, the first-doc-free interaction of translation_docs with the direct lane, and the needs_notarization condition.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('Calculate a server-authoritative USD price estimate') and immediately scopes it with 'pure, no side effects, nothing booked', which distinguishes it from the booking siblings. An agent can tell this is a pre-sale quote tool and not an action tool without opening the schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear trigger: 'Use when the customer asks about cost.' However, it never addresses the obvious alternative in the sibling list, request_price_match, leaving the agent to guess which pricing tool to pick.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources