markdown_to_docx
Convert Markdown into an editable Microsoft Word (.docx) document. Returns a downloadable URL.
Input Schema
TableJSON Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | No | Document title. | |
| markdown | Yes | Markdown source. |
TDQS
A4/5.0
Behavior3/5
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states the conversion behavior and return of a downloadable URL, which is useful. However, it does not disclose any edge cases, limitations, or operational details, so transparency is partial.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Conciseness5/5
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with the verb, includes the key outcome and result format—no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Completeness4/5
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple 2-parameter conversion tool, the description covers the essential purpose (Markdown to Word), the editable nature, and the delivery mechanism (downloadable URL). Lacks explicit usage guidance but is largely complete given the low complexity.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Parameters3/5
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Input schema already describes both parameters (title and markdown) with 100% coverage, so the description adds no additional parameter-specific detail. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Purpose5/5
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'Convert' with source 'Markdown' and target 'editable Microsoft Word (.docx)', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools that output HTML or PDF.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Usage Guidelines4/5
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Provides clear context that the output is an editable Word document and returns a URL, implying use when a downloadable Word file is needed. However, it doesn't explicitly exclude alternatives or state when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Try in Browser
Glama MCP Gateway
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
TDQS
A3.8/5.0
Disambiguation5/5
All six tools have clearly distinct purposes: converting markdown to different formats, merging/stamping PDFs, and checking recalls. No two tools are easily confused.
Naming Consistency4/5
Most tools use a verb_noun pattern (generate_pdf, merge_pdfs, watermark_pdf, check_recalls), but markdown_to_docx and markdown_to_html use a different pattern (source_to_target). The inconsistency is minor and still readable.
Tool Count4/5
With 6 tools, the count is reasonable for a document conversion utility. However, the inclusion of check_recalls feels out of place for a server named 'pdf', slightly diluting focus.
Completeness3/5
The tool set covers markdown-to-PDF and PDF merging/watermarking, but lacks PDF-to-other-format conversion, splitting, or editing. The recall checker is an unrelated gap filler. Core PDF workflows are partially covered.