Skip to main content
Glama

DeltaSignal ATLAS-7

StrategiX visual-spec compact search

strategix_visual_spec_search
Read-onlyIdempotent

Search compact visual-spec metadata by topic, source digest, embedded contract hash, receipt hash, project, diagram family, and tags. Returns compact metadata only; full HTML/SVG/XML is a drilldown concern.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMaximum results. Defaults to 10.
queryYesSearch query across compact metadata and built-in MVP fixture records.
artifactsNoOptional caller-supplied compact metadata records to search.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and idempotentHint=true, covering safety profiles. The description adds useful behavioral context by listing searchable fields and clarifying that only compact metadata is returned, not full HTML/SVG/XML.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two sentences, front-loaded with the action and resource, and every sentence adds value. No filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only search tool with strong annotations, full schema coverage, and an output schema, the description adequately covers purpose, scope, and return type. It does not need to elaborate on return values because the output schema exists.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description enhances query semantics by listing specific search dimensions (topic, source digest, contract hash, etc.), going beyond the schema's generic 'Search query' description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Search' with a precise resource 'compact visual-spec metadata' and enumerates searchable fields. It distinguishes from sibling tools like strategix_visual_spec_package by explicitly limiting scope to metadata and noting full HTML/SVG/XML is a drilldown concern.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly states the tool returns 'compact metadata only' and that full HTML/SVG/XML is a 'drilldown concern,' implying it is for metadata lookup rather than full content retrieval. It lacks an explicit alternative tool name, but the context is unambiguous.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

B3.1/5.0
Disambiguation2/5

Significant overlap exists between atlas7_* and deltasignal_* tools for the same concepts (covenant stress, readiness, peer ranking, morning brief, pressure board), and composite workflows coexist with their low-level components. The descriptions are detailed but the sheer number of similar-scope tools makes misselection likely.

Naming Consistency4/5

Most tools follow a consistent lower_snake_case pattern with a domain prefix (atlas7_, deltasignal_, strategix_). Verb-first names (generate_, resolve_, search_) and noun-only names (alpha_opportunities, readiness) are both used, but the convention is predictable enough to navigate.

Tool Count1/5

With 81 tools, the surface is far beyond the 25–50 range considered excessive. Many tools are composites, natural-language variants, or near-duplicates that could be consolidated, creating an extreme mismatch for typical MCP server scope.

Completeness4/5

The tool surface is extensive, covering fundamentals, covenant stress, alpha screening, peer ranking, daily changes, briefs, historical ATLAS data, TripCode resolution, perp factors, synthetic ETF audit, and StrategiX rendering. Minor gaps exist (watchlist persistence, thesis lifecycle), but core research workflows are well covered.

Resources