Skip to main content
Glama

buy_yields_protocol_benqi-lending

Paid. Live DeFi yields for benqi-lending: its pools across chains with APY, TVL, 7d APY change (DefiLlama data). $0.005 USDC on Base or Solana. No account, no API key. Failed calls not charged. URL https://southpow.media/v1/yields/protocol/benqi-lending.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "buy_yields_protocol_benqi-lending"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
sortNotvl (default) or apy
limitNoRows, 1-100 (default 20)
min_tvl_usdNoMinimum pool TVL in USD (default 100000)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden and does so well: it discloses paid access, exact price ($0.005 USDC on Base or Solana), no account/API key requirement, and that failed calls are not charged. It omits rate limits, response shape, and pagination behavior, which keeps it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the paid nature, then the resource and returned fields, then price/payment, then the endpoint URL. Every clause earns its place; no filler or repetition of the tool name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a paid, no-auth read endpoint with no output schema and no annotations, the description supplies the data source, the key returned metrics, cost, payment chains, and billing policy on failure — enough to decide and invoke. Error/pagination behavior is the only notable gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% — sort, limit, and min_tvl_usd each document their allowed values and defaults. The description adds no additional parameter meaning (e.g., how min_tvl_usd interacts with cross-chain pools), so the schema does all the work and the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific resource (live DeFi yield pools for the benqi-lending protocol), the returned fields (APY, TVL, 7d APY change) and the data source (DefiLlama). 'Its pools across chains' implicitly separates it from the buy_yields_chain_* and buy_yields_token_* siblings, but it never names or contrasts them explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use / when-not guidance or named alternatives among the hundreds of sibling yield tools. Usage is only implied by the protocol scope in the name and the 'across chains' phrasing, plus cost information that lets an agent weigh whether to call it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources