Skip to main content
Glama

buy_stable_usd1

Paid. World Liberty Financial USD (USD1) stablecoin live: price vs peg, supply, 1d/7d/30d supply change, supply per chain (DefiLlama data). $0.01 USDC on Base or Solana. No account, no API key. Failed calls not charged. URL https://southpow.media/v1/stablecoins/usd1.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "buy_stable_usd1"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.7/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Since there are no annotations, the description carries a heavy load and does so well. It discloses critical behavioral traits: that the service is paid, that calls are non-charging if they fail, and the specific deployment environment (Base or Solana).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The definition is highly dense but efficient; every part of the description delivers unique, valuable information—from the resource tracked to the payment method and technical constraints. This is concise without being overly simplistic.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the high specificity of the tool, the description is exceptionally complete. It answers who, what, where, how much, and how to access the data, leaving no ambiguity for the agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0 parameters, which provides no semantics. However, since the description is excellent, the baseline score of 4 is appropriate. It clarifies the tool requires no input from the user.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's specific function: providing live data (price, supply change, supply per chain) for the World Liberty Financial USD (USD1) stablecoin.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

While it doesn't explicitly name siblings, it provides strong operational guidance by detailing the cost ('$0.01 USDC on Base or Solana') and the ease of use ('No account, no API key'). This helps users decide if this specific service meets their prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources