Skip to main content
Glama

buy_coin_PENDLE

Paid. PENDLE/USD live: last price, 24h open/high/low, % change, 24h and 30d volume (Coinbase Exchange, Kraken cross-check). $0.25 USDC on Base. No account, no API key. Failed calls not charged. URL https://southpow.media/v1/price/PENDLE.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "buy_coin_PENDLE"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full behavioral burden and does well: it discloses that the call is paid ($0.25 USDC on Base), requires no auth, that failed calls are free, and which exchanges the data comes from with a Kraken cross-check. Missing only latency/freshness and error semantics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the critical fact ('Paid.') before anything else, then packs data fields, pricing, auth, and billing caveat into a few tight fragments with no filler. Every clause carries information an agent needs before calling.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, no-output-schema tool, the description effectively enumerates the returned fields and states cost, auth, and billing behavior. It stops short of describing the response envelope or timestamp granularity, which an agent would still have to discover.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so semantic burden is minimal and the description correctly does not invent any. It supplies the static endpoint URL and pricing context, which is the only configuration-like information relevant here.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific resource (PENDLE/USD live price) and enumerates the exact fields returned: last price, 24h open/high/low, % change, 24h and 30d volume, plus the data sources. It does not explicitly distinguish itself from the generic buy_crypto_price sibling, and the ticker-level differentiation comes from the tool name rather than the prose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage context is implied (fetch live PENDLE quote from a paid endpoint) and practical prerequisites are stated ('No account, no API key'), but there is no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance or pointer to alternatives such as buy_crypto_price for multi-asset queries.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources