Skip to main content
Glama

buy_coin_DASH

Paid. DASH/USD live: last price, 24h open/high/low, % change, 24h and 30d volume (Coinbase Exchange, Kraken cross-check). $0.10 USDC on Base. No account, no API key. Failed calls not charged. URL https://southpow.media/v1/price/DASH.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "buy_coin_DASH"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the behavioral burden well by disclosing the $0.10 USDC cost on Base, lack of account or API-key requirements, failed-call billing policy, and exchange sources. It could still clarify that pricing is per successful call, whether the operation is read-only, and how payment is handled.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loaded with paid status and data scope, followed by cost, prerequisites, failure billing, and endpoint. Every fragment contributes actionable information without filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple zero-input market-data tool, the listed metrics, sources, endpoint, and commercial terms provide nearly enough context despite the absent output schema. Exact response formatting and payment invocation details remain unspecified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so there are no undocumented inputs requiring compensation. The fixed DASH endpoint usefully reinforces that neither the asset nor the request scope is configurable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description identifies the exact resource and payload: live DASH/USD last price, 24-hour open/high/low, percentage change, and 24-hour and 30-day volume. This distinguishes it from other asset-specific siblings, but an explicit retrieval verb would better counter the potentially misleading buy_coin_DASH name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The live DASH/USD scope and enumerated metrics clearly establish when this tool is relevant, while the paid label makes an important selection constraint visible. It does not explicitly contrast the tool with buy_crypto_price or explain when another sibling is preferable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources