Skip to main content
Glama

URLinks

get_link_analytics

Read-only

Get click analytics for a shortlink — total clicks, daily breakdown, and last clicked time.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "shortlink": "<shortlink>"
    },
    "name": "get_link_analytics"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
daysNoNumber of days of history (default 30, max 90)
shortlinkYesThe shortlink to get analytics for (e.g., 'my/docs')

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

readOnlyHint=true already establishes this as a safe read. Beyond that, the description discloses the shape of the result — total clicks, daily breakdown, last clicked time — which is genuinely useful because no output schema exists. It omits timezone/bucketing semantics and behavior for links with zero clicks, keeping it short of a 5.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single sentence with the resource and the returned metrics front-loaded; there is no redundant restatement of the name and no filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter read-only tool with full schema coverage, the description covers purpose and return contents adequately. Minor gaps remain around aggregation semantics (timezone, whether the daily breakdown respects the `days` window) but nothing blocking for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the schema already documents the `days` default of 30 and maximum of 90 as well as the shortlink format. The description adds no parameter meaning beyond that, so the baseline 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb+resource ("Get click analytics for a shortlink") and enumerates the returned metrics, which separates it from the profile-level sibling get_profile_analytics. It does not name that sibling explicitly, so an agent must infer the distinction from the resource noun.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the agent can tell this is the analytics call for an existing shortlink, but there is no explicit statement of when to use it versus get_profile_analytics, nor any prerequisite (e.g., the link must exist). No exclusions are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.