Get My Bookings
get-my-bookings[Auth Required] Get the authenticated agent's booking events.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number | |
| perPage | No | Results per page |
get-my-bookings[Auth Required] Get the authenticated agent's booking events.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| page | No | Page number | |
| perPage | No | Results per page |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations are empty, so description carries full burden. Discloses auth requirement but omits other behaviors like pagination, idempotency, or data freshness. Adequate but not thorough.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, concise and to the point. No wasted words, but could be slightly more structured (e.g., separating auth note).
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema exists, so description should explain return values (e.g., list of bookings, pagination). It does not, leaving agents without full context for invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (both page and perPage have descriptions). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'booking events', and specifies scope 'authenticated agent'. Distinguishes from sibling tools like 'get-event' and 'get-my-events'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Includes '[Auth Required]' as a usage note, but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives like 'get-event' or 'book-event'. No exclusions or when-not-to-use.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.