Skip to main content
Glama

AdsAgent — Meta Ads MCP

render_ad_previews

Read-only

Show ads as preview cards

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "items": "<items>"
    },
    "name": "render_ad_previews"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
itemsYes
titleNo
currencyNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageNo
retryableNo
support_refNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / connection_context
      Removed value: -{
      -  "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / category
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / expected
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / failure_kind
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / responsibility_hint
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / route
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / user_visible
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / connection_context
      Added value: +{
      +  "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Added

TDQS

C2.3/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false. The description adds no behavioral context beyond the name, such as whether this renders visually, returns formatted text, requires specific ad data, or has any limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short phrase with no filler or repetition. It is front-loaded and structurally efficient, though its brevity contributes to gaps scored elsewhere.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given a rich nested input schema, an output schema, and multiple sibling rendering tools, the description is far too thin. It does not explain the required ad array, the purpose of title/currency, or how this renderer differs from other render tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate for undocumented parameters. It only weakly implies that 'items' are ads to preview and says nothing about the 'title' or 'currency' parameters or the many nested ad fields.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description essentially paraphrases the tool name: 'render ad previews' becomes 'show ads as preview cards.' It does not clarify what kind of preview is produced or how it differs from sibling rendering tools like render_ads_console or render_performance_report.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. The agent must infer its appropriate use from the name alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources