products_save_timezone_offset
Save one product's POSIX timezone offset
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_name | No | ||
| timezone_offset | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | No | ||
| retryable | No | ||
| support_ref | No |
Save one product's POSIX timezone offset
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| product_name | No | ||
| timezone_offset | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | No | ||
| retryable | No | ||
| support_ref | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description matches the annotations (write operation, destructive hint true) but does not disclose any potential side effects, overwrite behavior, or validation outcomes beyond the act of saving.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence with no redundant wording or unnecessary detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple save operation, the description is mostly adequate, but it omits any return value or confirmation behavior and does not clarify the optional product_name parameter.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds little beyond the parameter names. It does not clarify the expected format of timezone_offset, the role of product_name, or why product_name is not required in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Save'), the resource ('one product's POSIX timezone offset'), and is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like products_save_funnel_events.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any context about prerequisites or typical scenarios for saving a timezone offset.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.