products_list
List products and funnel/MMP event sources
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| view | No | full | |
| limit | No | ||
| cursor | No | ||
| channel_pid | No |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | No | ||
| retryable | No | ||
| support_ref | No |
List products and funnel/MMP event sources
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| view | No | full | |
| limit | No | ||
| cursor | No | ||
| channel_pid | No |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| message | No | ||
| retryable | No | ||
| support_ref | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Input schema / properties / connection_contextRemoved value: -{
- "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
- "type": "string"
-}Input schema / properties / viewAdded value: +{
+ "default": "full",
+ "enum": [
+ "full",
+ "refs"
+ ],
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / then / properties / categoryAdded value: +{
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / then / properties / expectedAdded value: +{
+ "type": "boolean"
+}Output schema / then / properties / failure_kindAdded value: +{
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / then / properties / responsibility_hintAdded value: +{
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / then / properties / routeAdded value: +{
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / then / properties / user_visibleAdded value: +{
+ "type": "boolean"
+}Input schema / properties / connection_contextAdded value: +{
+ "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / else / properties / meta / properties / metric_completenessAdded value: +{
+ "additionalProperties": {
+ "properties": {
+ "complete": {
+ "type": "boolean"
+ },
+ "excluded_rows": {
+ "type": "integer"
+ },
+ "reason": {
+ "type": [
+ "string",
+ "null"
+ ]
+ }
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+ },
+ "type": "object"
+}Output schema / else / properties / workspace_refAdded value: +{
+ "description": "Opaque workspace comparison hint; not an authorization credential.",
+ "pattern": "^workspace_[0-9a-f]{32}$",
+ "type": "string"
+}Output schema / else / properties / meta / properties / data_freshness / properties / last_pull_scopeAdded value: +{
+ "const": "workspace"
+}Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description only adds that the listing spans products and funnel/MMP event sources, but says nothing about pagination behavior or how 'view' changes the response shape.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The single short sentence is front-loaded and free of bloat. However, it is under-specified for a tool with four parameters and a view-mode enum, so its brevity comes at the cost of useful detail.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
An output schema exists, so return values need not be explained, and annotations cover safety. But with 0% schema coverage on four parameters, the definition is not complete enough for an agent to call the tool correctly, particularly regarding view mode and pagination.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% across four parameters, yet the description provides no explanation of any parameter. The critical 'view' enum (full vs. refs), the limit maximum, the cursor pagination token, and the channel_pid filter are all left entirely undocumented.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
States the verb 'List' and two resources ('products' and 'funnel/MMP event sources'), so the basic purpose is recoverable. However, it doesn't differentiate itself from closely related siblings such as products_get_funnel_candidates, products_get_funnel_values, or mmp_get_state, and the combined 'funnel/MMP event sources' phrasing is ambiguous.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus the many product and MMP siblings, and no mention of prerequisites or exclusions. The agent must infer usage from the name alone.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.