Skip to main content
Glama

AdsAgent — Meta Ads MCP

mmp_insights_get_product_today

Read-only

Read today's D0 cohort; channel_pid required

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
todayNo
event_keysNo
channel_pidYes
product_refNo
product_nameNo

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
messageNo
retryableNo
support_refNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • removedInput schema / properties / connection_context
      Removed value: -{
      -  "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
      -  "type": "string"
      -}
  2. Changed6 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / category
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / expected
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / failure_kind
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / responsibility_hint
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / route
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / then / properties / user_visible
      Added value: +{
      +  "type": "boolean"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / connection_context
      Added value: +{
      +  "pattern": "^mctx_v1_[0-9a-f]{64}$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  4. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / $defs / sa
      Added value: +{
      +  "properties": {
      +    "can_report_stored_total": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "reason": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "zero_proven": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "can_report_stored_total",
      +    "zero_proven",
      +    "reason"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / else / properties / read_evidence
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Proofs apply independently to returned metrics and scope as stored/observed. A new read_ref is a call identifier, never a source watermark. False or missing proof means unknown, not zero. Fingerprints correlate requests/results in audits; they are not authorization or pagination tokens.",
      +  "properties": {
      +    "artifact_returned": {
      +      "type": "boolean"
      +    },
      +    "configuration": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "account_inventory_enumerated": {
      +          "const": false
      +        },
      +        "all_campaigns_paused_proven": {
      +          "const": false
      +        },
      +        "requested_ids_complete": {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "scope": {
      +          "const": "requested_entity_ids_only"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "mmp": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "can_report_scoped_totals": {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "provider_cache_max_age_seconds": {
      +          "const": 90
      +        },
      +        "reason": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "scope": {
      +          "const": "linked_apps_queried_channels_and_windows"
      +        },
      +        "source_observed_at": {
      +          "type": "null"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "read_ref": {
      +      "pattern": "^read_[0-9a-f]{32}$",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "request_fingerprint": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "result_fingerprint": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "scopes": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "all_campaigns_paused_proven": {
      +            "const": false
      +          },
      +          "funnel": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/sa"
      +            },
      +            "maxProperties": 32,
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "index": {
      +            "type": "integer"
      +          },
      +          "inventory_anchor": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "inventory_coverage": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "inventory_source_observed_at": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "metrics": {
      +            "additionalProperties": {
      +              "$ref": "#/$defs/sa"
      +            },
      +            "type": "object"
      +          },
      +          "metrics_source_observed_at": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "range_complete": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "boolean",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "scope": {
      +            "const": "stored_query"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "maxItems": 10,
      +      "type": "array"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "read_ref",
      +    "request_fingerprint",
      +    "result_fingerprint"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  5. First observed

TDQS

C2.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so safety is covered structurally. The description adds the "today's D0" scoping notion, which is real context beyond annotations, but leaves what a D0 cohort means and how it is computed opaque.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The single line is compact and front-loads the resource, but at this length it is under-specification rather than conciseness — every sentence earns its place only because there is barely any content to waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 5-parameter tool with 0% schema coverage, an output schema, and three similarly named mmp_insights siblings, the description omits almost everything an agent needs to select and call it correctly. The presence of an output schema excuses return-value explanation but not the missing parameter and disambiguation context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 5 parameters, so the description must compensate and does not: it only notes channel_pid is required, which the schema already enforces. today, event_keys, product_ref, and product_name receive no explanation of format or meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

"Read today's D0 cohort" gives a verb and a resource scope, which is more than a tautology, but "D0 cohort" is unexplained domain jargon and the description never distinguishes this from close siblings like mmp_insights_query_product_cohort or mmp_insights_get_product_event_today. An agent can guess it returns same-day acquisition data but not why to pick this over the alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The only guidance is "channel_pid required," which restates the schema's required field rather than saying when to use this tool. Nothing states when to prefer it over the other mmp_insights_* siblings or what prerequisites exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources