Skip to main content
Glama

A trade account

account_status
Read-onlyIdempotent

A trade account (account, or the wallet's own): its owner, its agent and the agent's limits (with today's loss against its daily loss budget and what that still lets the agent do: opens, deposit withdrawals and trigger-sets while it has room; closes and top-ups always), the USDG and stock it holds, its shorts and leveraged longs with their LTV (Morpho's own), how much of their limit each uses and the price that liquidates it, which positions have no trigger, every live trigger with its distance from the price now, who can do what, and the market clock. Triggers do not fire while the stock market is shut or the feed has not printed within 25 hours; a price crossed while it is shut (a weekend, a holiday) fires once the market opens again, at the price the feed prints then, within the trigger's slip, and after a gap that price can be well past the trigger's.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "account_status"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
walletNoThe account's owner (when account is not given), or a wallet to say whether it is the owner or the agent
accountNoA trade account's address (default: the wallet's own, as its owner; an agent gives its owner's account)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already establish the read-only, idempotent, non-destructive profile. The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond that, especially the rules for when triggers fire around market closures and stale feeds, including the 25-hour feed condition and gap behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one long, dense sentence with nested parentheticals and semicolon-separated clauses. It is not front-loaded with a clear summary and is difficult to parse quickly, even though much of the content is useful.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the burden of explaining what is returned. It does this extensively, listing account ownership, agent limits, holdings, positions, trigger state, permissions, and market clock, though it does not describe response shape or formatting.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents wallet and account semantics. The description repeats the default account behavior but adds no syntax or format detail beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description makes clear that this tool exposes a trade account's full state, listing owner, agent, limits, holdings, positions, triggers, permissions, and market clock. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from sibling tools such as position, health, or trigger_list, which keeps it below a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description is purely a statement of contents and does not say when an agent should prefer account_status over position, health, trigger_list, or market.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources