search_catalog
Search the merchant catalog for products matching a free-text query.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| catalog | Yes |
Search the merchant catalog for products matching a free-text query.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| catalog | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description must bear the full burden. It only states it searches, but does not disclose pagination behavior, return format, or any limitations or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, concise and front-loaded. However, it is too brief for a tool with nested parameters and no output schema, making it less helpful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the nested input schema, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely incomplete. It omits pagination, sorting, result details, and any usage context.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, yet the description only mentions 'free-text query', partially explaining the query parameter. It does not explain pagination or the nested structure, leaving significant meaning missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it searches the merchant catalog for products using a free-text query. It uses a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling 'lookup_catalog', so it loses the top score.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like lookup_catalog. No when-not-to-use or context provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.