Skip to main content
Glama

Get public profile

get_public_profile
Read-onlyIdempotent

Get the user's ATTIM profile: address, name, bio, socials, theme, links with their ids, projects (and which ones visitors cannot see), and version. profile is null when they have none.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "get_public_profile"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Output Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
slugNo
linksNo
profileYes
siteUrlNo
versionNo
projectsNo

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changed
    • removedInput schema / additionalProperties
      Removed value: -false
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "$defs": {
      +    "link": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "disabled": {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "group": {
      +          "type": [
      +            "string",
      +            "null"
      +          ]
      +        },
      +        "id": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "label": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "section": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        },
      +        "trackingEnabled": {
      +          "type": "boolean"
      +        },
      +        "url": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "required": [
      +        "id",
      +        "label",
      +        "url"
      +      ],
      +      "type": "object"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "properties": {
      +    "links": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "pinned": {
      +          "items": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/link"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        "smart": {
      +          "items": {
      +            "$ref": "#/$defs/link"
      +          },
      +          "type": "array"
      +        },
      +        "version": {
      +          "type": "integer"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "profile": {
      +      "properties": {
      +        "name": {
      +          "type": "string"
      +        }
      +      },
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "projects": {
      +      "items": {
      +        "properties": {
      +          "label": {
      +            "type": [
      +              "string",
      +              "null"
      +            ]
      +          },
      +          "slug": {
      +            "type": "string"
      +          },
      +          "visible": {
      +            "type": "boolean"
      +          }
      +        },
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "siteUrl": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "slug": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "version": {
      +      "type": "integer"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "profile"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, non-destructive, and closed-world, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds genuinely new behavior: the response is null when no profile exists, and hidden projects are surfaced with visibility information. It does not mention auth requirements or how visibility filtering is applied.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single dense sentence lists exactly what is returned, front-loading the resource, and a short second sentence covers the null case. No filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With a full output schema and complete annotations, the description needs only to frame the resource, which it does, including the null case. The one gap is the missing contrast with the sibling get_profile, which matters for tool selection.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters and the schema coverage is 100%, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate. The enumerated response fields are a bonus rather than a necessity.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: get the user's ATTIM profile, then enumerates the exact fields returned (address, name, bio, socials, theme, links, projects, version). It is clear what the tool does, but it never distinguishes itself from the sibling get_profile, leaving the public/private distinction implicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied by the word 'public' and the note that hidden projects are included; there is no explicit statement of when to call this versus get_profile or save_profile. An agent must infer that this is the visitor-facing view.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources