Skip to main content
Glama

KB국민카드 승인내역 페이지 조회

kb_biz_card__approvals__page
Read-only

REQUIRES prior kb_biz_card__session__login call with same account_link_id. Fetch one KB Biz Card approvals page from a prior search context. For an authenticated call, generate and save request_idempotency_key before the first request. Reuse it with the same arguments only to recover that request after a lost response; use a new key for a new execution. Without it, calling again remains a new request. This optional key is not available to anonymous taste calls. Keep any provider-specific idempotency_key unchanged; it is a different field. 호출마다 토큰 1소진

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
pageYesPage number to fetch
search_contextYesSearch context returned by init/search
account_link_idNoAccount link ID (UUID v4). Optional — the server auto-resolves from your API key when omitted. Provide explicitly only when you have multiple certificates for the same provider. Each institution has a separate ID (Hometax != NHIS != NPS != FourInsure).
request_idempotency_keyNoOptional same-request recovery key for authenticated calls; see the tool description.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / request_idempotency_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional same-request recovery key for authenticated calls; see the tool description.",
      +  "maxLength": 128,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "pattern": "^[\\x20-\\x7E]+$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond the readOnlyHint and destructiveHint annotations, it discloses login prerequisites, idempotency-key recovery behavior, and that each call consumes one token. The phrase about anonymous 'taste calls' is somewhat unclear, but the description still adds meaningful operational transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The prerequisite and purpose are front-loaded, which is good, but the description is dense and spends several sentences on idempotency semantics that could be tightened. The trailing Korean token note is concise but appears without much framing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex paginated, authenticated call with a nested search_context object, the description covers the key prerequisites and idempotency behavior. It does not explain what a returned page contains or pagination limits, and there is no output schema to compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is already 100%, but the description adds substantial meaning for request_idempotency_key: when to generate it, when to reuse it, when to use a new one, and that it is different from a provider-specific idempotency_key. It also reinforces the same-account_link_id prerequisite, which helps interpret that optional parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: fetching one KB Biz Card approvals page from a prior search context. It is clear on scope, but it does not explicitly distinguish this tool from sibling tools such as kb_biz_card__approvals__result or __search.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives a clear prerequisite: a prior kb_biz_card__session__login call with the same account_link_id, and it says the page comes from a prior search context. It does not explicitly compare this tool to alternatives or state when to stop paging, so it is not a 5.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources