Skip to main content
Glama

근로복지공단 보험료 부과고지 검색

comwel__info__premium_billing_notice__search
Read-only

REQUIRES prior comwel__auth__npki_session__login call with same account_link_id. Search COMWEL premium billing notices. Files: a document generated from this result, as Excel (xlsx) only when requested in output_formats, listed in artifacts[] of the result with a download_url that works for 15 minutes; each file is kept for 7 days. If a link has expired, call xdata__job__result with the job_id from the result for fresh links. For an anonymous result, keep its private recovery_receipt and send it with the original job_id or pack_run_id to xdata__job__result. It grants access to that result only, until the original file retention expires. Do not publish it. Losing it cannot be repaired by signing up. The receipt also works if the client later signs in; it does not grant access to other results. Without a receipt, results require the original account and lane. For an authenticated call, generate and save request_idempotency_key before the first request. Reuse it with the same arguments only to recover that request after a lost response; use a new key for a new execution. Without it, calling again remains a new request. This optional key is not available to anonymous taste calls. Keep any provider-specific idempotency_key unchanged; it is a different field. 호출마다 토큰 1소진

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
billing_yearYesBilling year YYYY
billing_monthYesBilling month MM
output_formatsNoOptional. Also return this result as a file (Excel (xlsx)) in artifacts[] of the result. Omit it for data only.
account_link_idNoAccount link ID (UUID v4). Optional — the server auto-resolves from your API key when omitted. Provide explicitly only when you have multiple certificates for the same provider. Each institution has a separate ID (Hometax != NHIS != NPS != FourInsure).
business_management_noNoBusiness management number (optional; selects the workplace)
request_idempotency_keyNoOptional same-request recovery key for authenticated calls; see the tool description.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / request_idempotency_key
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional same-request recovery key for authenticated calls; see the tool description.",
      +  "maxLength": 128,
      +  "minLength": 1,
      +  "pattern": "^[\\x20-\\x7E]+$",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / output_formats
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Optional. Also return this result as a file (Excel (xlsx)) in artifacts[] of the result. Omit it for data only.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "enum": [
      +      "xlsx"
      +    ],
      +    "type": "string"
      +  },
      +  "minItems": 1,
      +  "type": "array",
      +  "uniqueItems": true
      +}
  3. First observed

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the baseline is lower, but the description adds substantial operational context: token cost, file retention (7 days) and download URL expiry (15 minutes), idempotency key behavior, and anonymous recovery receipt rules. This is rich beyond the annotations, though some boilerplate is tangential to the core search behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The core purpose is stated early, but the description runs long and includes extensive boilerplate about recovery receipts, idempotency keys, and file retention. Several sentences are operational policy rather than tool-specific selection guidance, making it less front-loaded and harder to scan.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description covers preconditions, file output handling, and recovery paths well. It stops short of describing what the main data payload contains (notice fields, pagination), so it is not fully complete for a search tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents most parameters. The description still adds meaningful semantics for `request_idempotency_key` (generate before first request, reuse only for recovery, new key for new execution) that goes beyond the schema's brief pointer, justifying a score above the baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Search COMWEL premium billing notices.' It is clear what the tool does. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling `comwel__info__premium_billing_notice__detail`, so an agent must infer that this is the list-level search rather than the detail lookup.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives a prerequisite ('REQUIRES prior comwel__auth__npki_session__login') and explains post-call handling (expired links, recovery receipts, idempotency). But it never explicitly states when to use this search versus the detail sibling or other notice-related tools, leaving alternative selection implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources