Skip to main content
Glama

Set brand kit

set_brand_kit
Idempotent

Sets the project's brand palette from an uploaded logo or explicit accent color and can place a supplied logo sting before the platform end card.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "set_brand_kit"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
logoNo
stingNo
accentNo
project_idYesExplicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / project_id / description
      Previous value: -"Required immutable scope for this call. Copy the id from list_projects/open_project/project_state; the active-project pointer is never used to guess."New value: +"Explicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target."
  2. Added

TDQS

B3.2/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare non-read-only, idempotent, non-destructive, closed-world behavior, so the safety profile is covered. The description usefully adds that the call can mutate the delivered composition by inserting a logo sting before the platform end card, but it does not say whether an existing brand kit is replaced, what happens if both logo and accent are supplied, or whether the derived palette overrides manually set colors.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single dense sentence with the primary action front-loaded and no filler. It could be split to separate palette setting from sting placement, but nothing is redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

placeholder

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is only 25%, with just project_id documented, so the description must carry the other three parameters. It does give each a role (logo as palette source, accent as explicit color, sting as pre-end-card placement), but adds no format or constraint detail such as whether accent is a hex string or how the sting asset is referenced.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description names a specific verb and resource ('sets the project's brand palette') and enumerates the two input routes (uploaded logo or explicit accent color) plus an optional sting placement. That is enough to separate it from look-and-feel siblings like apply_look or set_color_grade, though no sibling is named explicitly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no stated when-to-use, when-not-to-use, or alternative. With siblings such as add_accent and apply_look in the inventory, the description never clarifies whether this is the project-wide branding step versus a per-element accent, and it does not state the prerequisite that the logo must already be uploaded via upload_start/attach.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.