Skip to main content
Glama

Remove zoom path

remove_zoom_path
Idempotent

Removes an identified keyframed traveling zoom.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "remove_zoom_path"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
project_idYesExplicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / project_id / description
      Previous value: -"Required immutable scope for this call. Copy the id from list_projects/open_project/project_state; the active-project pointer is never used to guess."New value: +"Explicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target."
  2. First observed

TDQS

C2.9/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, and openWorldHint=false, so safety and repeatability are covered. The description adds that the target is a keyframed zoom path, which is the object being deleted, but says nothing about side effects — whether keyframe data is discarded, whether surrounding motion is retimed, or whether the removal can be undone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short, front-loaded sentence with no filler. It is efficient, though its brevity is partly the cause of the missing semantic detail rather than evidence of tight curation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

It is a destructive-capable mutation tool with no output schema and half-undocumented parameters. The description should say what the caller gets back or what state the timeline ends in; instead it only restates the operation, leaving real gaps for a two-parameter edit tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 50%: project_id is documented ('the connection's navigation pointer does not select the target'), but id has no description at all. The phrase 'an identified keyframed traveling zoom' hints that id identifies the zoom path, but the description neither confirms nor disambiguates it, and adds no meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb ('Removes') and a specific resource ('an identified keyframed traveling zoom'), which is more precise than a generic 'delete zoom'. However, it never names the sibling remove_zoom or explains how a 'traveling zoom path' differs from the zoom that remove_zoom presumably handles, so an agent must infer the split.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no when-to-use guidance and no exclusions. With a closely named sibling (remove_zoom) in the toolset, the omission of any routing rule leaves the agent to guess which removal tool applies to a given keyframed zoom.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.