Skip to main content
Glama

Remove speed

remove_speed
Idempotent

Removes an identified speed span, restores normal playback speed and re-anchors program-time items.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "id": "<id>",
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "remove_speed"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYes
project_idYesExplicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / project_id / description
      Previous value: -"Required immutable scope for this call. Copy the id from list_projects/open_project/project_state; the active-project pointer is never used to guess."New value: +"Explicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare the safety profile (non-readonly, idempotent, non-destructive); the description adds real behavioral content by disclosing two side effects: playback speed returns to normal and program-time items are re-anchored. It is consistent with destructiveHint=false and does not contradict any annotation, though it says nothing about failure behavior for a stale or invalid id.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single front-loaded sentence naming the action first and its consequences second, with no filler. Every clause carries distinct information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple two-parameter removal tool with annotations covering safety and idempotency, the description supplies what is missing from structured fields: the downstream edits it triggers. The main gap is the provenance of the span id, which the agent needs in order to invoke it correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50%: project_id is documented in the schema, including the note that the navigation pointer does not select the target, while id is bare. The description adds only that the span is 'identified', without saying what kind of id it is or where it comes from, so it does not compensate for the undocumented parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description gives a specific verb and resource ('Removes an identified speed span') plus the resulting state change, which clearly separates it from set_speed and set_speed_ramp. It stops short of naming those siblings explicitly, so an agent must infer the pairing.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied rather than stated: you call this to undo an existing speed span. There is no explicit guidance on when to prefer this over setting speed back to 1x via set_speed, or what to do if the span id is unknown.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.