Skip to main content
Glama

Remove screen frame

remove_screen_frame
Idempotent

Removes the inset screen frame and returns the picture to full bleed.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "remove_screen_frame"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idYesExplicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedInput schema / properties / project_id / description
      Previous value: -"Required immutable scope for this call. Copy the id from list_projects/open_project/project_state; the active-project pointer is never used to guess."New value: +"Explicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and idempotentHint=true, which covers the safety profile of this mutation. The description adds useful context by describing the visual effect (full-bleed restoration) but says nothing about reversibility, the no-op case, or whether the removed frame's settings are retained for later reuse.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One short sentence, front-loaded with the action and closed by the resulting state; every word carries information and there is nothing to trim.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a single-parameter removal tool with no output schema, full param coverage and annotations covering safety and idempotency, the description supplies what an agent needs to call it correctly. The only real gap is the absence of guidance on behavior when no frame is applied.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is a single parameter with 100% schema description coverage, so the schema already explains project_id, including the note that the navigation pointer does not select the target. The description adds no parameter-level meaning, which is acceptable at full coverage but not above baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb ('Removes') and resource ('the inset screen frame') and adds the concrete visual outcome ('returns the picture to full bleed'), so the agent knows exactly what changes. It does not explicitly name the inverse sibling set_screen_frame, so differentiation relies on the obvious naming pair rather than stated text.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is only implied: the agent can infer it applies when an inset screen frame exists on the project. There is no explicit statement about when to use this instead of set_screen_frame or what happens if no frame is present, leaving the agent to reason from the add/set/remove naming pattern.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.