Skip to main content
Glama

Read an explicit project's state

project_state
Read-only

Returns the current video, transcript, shots, edit decision list and assets for the explicitly identified project.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "project_id": "<project_id>"
    },
    "name": "project_state"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idYesExplicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / project_id / description
      Added value: +"Explicit project identifier for this request. The connection's navigation pointer does not select the target."
  2. First observed

TDQS

A4.3/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered and the description need not restate it. The description adds that the call returns a 'complete state' spanning five artifacts, which signals a heavy aggregate response. It stops short of warning about payload size or call cost for repeated polling, which would matter for an aggregate read.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences, front-loaded with the return payload and immediately followed by the routing rule; nothing is padded. A slightly tighter phrasing of the subset deferral would make it a 5.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a one-parameter read with no output schema, the description is close to sufficient because it enumerates the returned artifacts, which substitutes for a documented return shape. It leaves minor gaps about response size and whether the snapshot is a point-in-time view, but nothing that would prevent a correct call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the parameter's meaning is already documented in the schema, and the description adds no syntax, format, or selection detail beyond 'the specified project'. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema carries parameter semantics on its own.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Returns the complete state ... for the specified project') and enumerates exactly what that state contains (video, transcript, shots, EDL, assets). An agent can immediately distinguish it from get_video_info, get_transcript, get_shots, get_edl, and list_assets without opening any schema.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It gives an explicit when-to-use rule ('when you need the full snapshot of a single project, including the EDL and assets') and an explicit alternative rule ('For specific subsets, prefer the dedicated tools'), naming five sibling tools. This is the strongest form of routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.