get_appFetch a single app's details (region, stack, status, URLs, flags). Scalingo API: GET /v1/apps/{app}. Returns { app }.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| app | Yes | The app name (e.g. my-production-app) or app id (app-…). |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, but the description adds context about the API endpoint and return structure, including the specific fields (region, stack, status, URLs, flags). This goes beyond the annotation, though it could mention error handling or authentication requirements.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences: one for purpose and fields, one for API reference. Every word adds value, no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple read tool with one parameter and readOnlyHint, the description covers what is needed: what it does, the fields returned, and the API endpoint. No output schema exists, but the description compensates by listing return fields.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema already describes the 'app' parameter fully (name or id). The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond the API path reference, so it scores the baseline for high schema coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it fetches a single app's details and lists the specific fields returned (region, stack, status, URLs, flags). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like list_apps by focusing on a single app.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for retrieving a single app, but it does not explicitly mention when to use it over alternatives like list_apps or get_account. No when-not-to-use guidance is provided, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool targets a distinct resource or action: get_app vs get_app_logs vs get_app_stats are clearly different; list_addon_providers vs list_addons differentiate available vs provisioned. Mutation tools (restart, scale, trigger_deployment, set_variables) are unique. The fallback scalingo_request is a separate generic GET. No confusion between tools.
All tools use snake_case with a verb_noun pattern (get_, list_, restart_, scale_, trigger_, set_). The only exception is 'scalingo_request' which breaks the pattern, but it is clearly documented as a power-user escape hatch. Overall very consistent.
21 tools is well-scoped for a PaaS platform covering core resources like apps, deployments, addons, domains, env variables, and collaborators. It covers the essential operations without being bloated; each tool serves a clear purpose.
The toolset is heavily read-oriented; mutations are limited to restart, scale, set_variables, and trigger_deployment. Missing CRUD for major resources: no create/delete app, add/remove collaborators, add/remove domains, provision/delete addons, or update app settings. Agents will face dead ends when needing to perform writes beyond the few covered.