Get customer
recharge_get_customerGet a single customer by id, including contact details, Shopify customer id, and subscription/charge counts. Recharge REST: GET /customers/{id}.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Customer id. |
recharge_get_customerGet a single customer by id, including contact details, Shopify customer id, and subscription/charge counts. Recharge REST: GET /customers/{id}.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Customer id. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true; description adds that it returns contact details, Shopify customer id, and counts, but no additional behavioral traits like error handling or permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two concise sentences, front-loaded with purpose and included fields, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Reasonably complete for a simple read operation with one parameter, though no output schema exists to detail return structure.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema covers 100% of parameters; description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema's 'Customer id.'
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Get a single customer by id' and lists included fields, distinguishing from list tools like recharge_list_customers.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage for retrieving a specific customer, but no explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.