numeral_pingHealth check — verifies the API key works and reports the environment (test/prod), api_version, and server timestamp. Numeral: GET /tax/ping.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true. The description adds specific output fields (environment, api_version, timestamp), providing useful behavioral context beyond annotations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence that is clear and front-loaded. No redundant information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, the description fully explains purpose and return values. No gaps.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so description need not cover parameter semantics. Baseline 4 applies as no param information is missing.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states it is a health check that verifies the API key and reports environment, api_version, and server timestamp. It is specific and distinct from all sibling tools, which involve tax calculation, customer/product creation, etc.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for verifying API connectivity and checking environment. No explicit when-not-to-use or alternatives are needed since this tool is unique among siblings.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Each tool has a distinct purpose with no overlap. Tax calculations, product/customer management, transaction recording, refunds, and health check are clearly separated.
All tools use a consistent 'numeral_verb_noun' pattern with snake_case. Verbs are standard (calculate, create, get, list, ping) and maintain predictability.
11 tools cover the core functionalities of tax calculation, product/customer management, transaction recording, and refunds without unnecessary extras.
Core CRUD is incomplete: missing lists for customers and transactions, and no update/delete endpoints. While key workflows are covered, significant operational gaps exist.