Skip to main content
Glama

Get entity

mercoa_get_entity
Read-only

Get a single entity by ID (or foreign ID). GET /entity/{entityId}.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
entityIdYesEntity ID (e.g. ent_...) or foreign ID.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.8/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true. The description adds no further behavioral details (e.g., error handling, authorization) beyond restating the GET endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

One concise sentence with no waste, front-loaded with verb and resource. Includes useful HTTP method and path. Efficient for a simple tool.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple get-by-ID tool with 1 parameter, 100% schema coverage, and read-only annotations, the description is mostly complete. Lacks details on return value or error cases, but baseline expectations are met.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description covers 100% of the single parameter. The description adds no new information beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., path parameter, foreign ID). Baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses specific verb 'Get' and resource 'single entity by ID (or foreign ID)', clearly distinguishing from sibling 'mercoa_find_entities' which searches entities.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates use when you have an entity ID, but does not explicitly state when not to use (e.g., use find_entities for searching) or provide alternative guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource (entity, invoice, transaction, payment method, organization) and action (create, find, get, list, update, add). There is no ambiguity between tools.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow the consistent pattern 'mercoa_verb_noun' using snake_case. Verbs like create, find, get, list, update are used predictably.

Tool Count5/5

With 17 tools covering entities, invoices, transactions, payment methods, and organization, the count is well-scoped for a financial platform. Each tool justifies its existence.

Completeness4/5

The toolset covers core CRUD and query operations for the main resources. Minor gaps exist such as missing delete operations for entities and invoices, but the surface is largely complete for typical workflows.