Skip to main content
Glama

Get a broadcast

magicbell_get_broadcast
Read-only

Fetch a single broadcast by id. Project API: GET /broadcasts/{broadcast_id}.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
broadcast_idYesBroadcast id.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.

  1. First observed

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so read-only nature is covered. Description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., auth, rate limits, side effects).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with no fluff. Includes API endpoint for extra context. Every sentence justifies its existence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Simple fetch-by-id tool with readOnlyHint and one required param; description is adequate but lacks return format or error details. No output schema to compensate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with description 'Broadcast id.' The tool description adds no extra meaning beyond that, earning the baseline score.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states action (fetch), resource (broadcast), and identifier (id). Explicitly distinguishes from list tool (sibling magicbell_list_broadcasts).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implicitly indicates using it when you have a specific broadcast_id, but no explicit when-to-use or when-to-avoid guidance, nor alternatives mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4/5.0
Disambiguation5/5

Each tool targets a distinct resource and action (create, get, list, update) with no overlap. Verbs and nouns are clearly separated.

Naming Consistency5/5

All tools follow a consistent 'magicbell_verb_noun' pattern, with verbs (create, get, list, update) and singular/plural usage appropriate to the operation.

Tool Count5/5

13 tools cover core user management, broadcast/event observability, and configuration listing without being excessive or sparse for a notification platform.

Completeness4/5

Covers user CRUD (missing delete), broadcast/event/get/list, and configuration listing. While some write operations are absent, the set supports essential admin and observability tasks.