Get a domain
dnsimple_get_domainRetrieve a single domain by name or id. API: GET /{account}/domains/{domain}.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | Domain name (e.g. example.com) or numeric domain id. |
dnsimple_get_domainRetrieve a single domain by name or id. API: GET /{account}/domains/{domain}.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| domain | Yes | Domain name (e.g. example.com) or numeric domain id. |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so the description adds minimal behavioral context (API endpoint) but no contradiction.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two short sentences, front-loaded with the action, no wasted words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
No output schema provided; the description omits details about the return value (domain object fields), which would help complete the picture.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The description adds value beyond the schema by specifying that the domain parameter can be a name or ID, which the schema also mentions but the description reinforces.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Retrieve a single domain') and the identifier method ('by name or id'), distinguishing it from list or check siblings.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage for getting one domain but does not explicitly compare with siblings or state when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.