Uptimeify

Domain expiry

domain_expiry

Read-only

Reports a domain's registration expiry from WHOIS with the remaining days, plus registrar, creation and update dates and the EPP status codes that reveal redemption or pending delete. Covers the registration, not the TLS certificate (check_ssl). tldSupported=false means the TLD has no queryable WHOIS server, not that the domain is unregistered. Anonymous, rate-limited per IP.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`domain`	Yes	Domain name, e.g. deinkunde.com

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`ok`	No
`tld`	No
`error`	No
`found`	No
`domain`	No
`statuses`	No
`createdAt`	No
`expiresAt`	No
`registrar`	No
`updatedAt`	No
`tldSupported`	No
`daysUntilExpiry`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed22 schema fields changedSep 11, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / createdAt / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / createdAt / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / daysUntilExpiry / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "number"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / daysUntilExpiry / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "number",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / domain / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / domain / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / error / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / error / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / expiresAt / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / expiresAt / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / found / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / found / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / ok / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / ok / type

Added value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]

removedOutput schema / properties / registrar / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / registrar / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / tld / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / tld / type

Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]

removedOutput schema / properties / tldSupported / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / tldSupported / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / updatedAt / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / updatedAt / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

Changed1 schema field changedAug 4, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "properties": {
+    "createdAt": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "daysUntilExpiry": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "number"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "domain": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "error": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "expiresAt": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "found": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "registrar": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "statuses": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "items": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "tld": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "tldSupported": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "updatedAt": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedAug 4, 2026

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint and openWorldHint; the description adds genuinely non-obvious behavior: anonymous access, per-IP rate limiting, and the counter-intuitive meaning of tldSupported=false ('not that the domain is unregistered'). That last point prevents a real misinterpretation, though nothing is said about failure modes for non-existent domains.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each carrying distinct load: what is returned, what it is not, and the tldSupported/rate-limit caveats. The core purpose leads, and no sentence is padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, so return values need no further explanation, and the description covers the behavioral envelope (anonymity, rate limits) plus the one edge case (tldSupported) that an agent could misread. Nothing needed to call it correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Only one parameter and schema description coverage is 100%, with an example ('deinkunde.com') already in the schema, so the baseline of 3 applies. The description adds no format, TLD, or IDN guidance beyond what the schema supplies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Reports a domain's registration expiry from WHOIS') and enumerates the returned facts (remaining days, registrar, creation/update dates, EPP status codes). It explicitly separates itself from the close sibling check_ssl, so an agent can route correctly without opening schemas.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives a clear positive context (registration expiry, EPP redemption/pending-delete states) and an explicit exclusion with the alternative named ('Covers the registration, not the TLS certificate (check_ssl)'). It does not, however, position itself against the sibling 'whois' tool, which is the nearest alternative, so the routing guidance is incomplete.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Uptimeify tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?