Uptimeify

check_dns

Read-only

Resolve a domain's DNS records in one call (A, AAAA, CNAME, MX, TXT, NS, SOA and more), returning each record type with its values and a per-type error where a lookup failed. Answers come from the resolver Uptimeify uses, so this is one vantage point: to see whether the answer is already the same everywhere, use dns_propagation. It reads records only and never connects to the host. Anonymous and rate-limited per IP.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`domain`	Yes	Domain name, e.g. deinkunde.com

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`ok`	No
`found`	No
`domain`	No
`records`	No
`warnings`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed7 schema fields changedSep 11, 2026

removedOutput schema / properties / domain / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "string"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / domain / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "string",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / found / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / found / type
```
Added value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]
```

removedOutput schema / properties / ok / anyOf

Removed value: -[
-  {
-    "type": "boolean"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]

addedOutput schema / properties / ok / type

Added value: +[
+  "boolean",
+  "null"
+]

changedOutput schema / properties / records / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "items": {
-      "additionalProperties": {},
-      "properties": {
-        "error": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "type": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "values": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "items": {
-                "type": "string"
-              },
-              "type": "array"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        }
-      },
-      "type": "object"
-    },
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "items": {
+      "additionalProperties": {},
+      "properties": {
+        "error": {
+          "type": [
+            "string",
+            "null"
+          ]
+        },
+        "type": {
+          "type": [
+            "string",
+            "null"
+          ]
+        },
+        "values": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "items": {
+                "type": "string"
+              },
+              "type": "array"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

Changed1 schema field changedAug 4, 2026

changedOutput schema / (root)

Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
+  "$schema": "http://json-schema.org/draft-07/schema#",
+  "additionalProperties": {},
+  "properties": {
+    "domain": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "string"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "found": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "ok": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "type": "boolean"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "records": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "items": {
+            "additionalProperties": {},
+            "properties": {
+              "error": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "string"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              },
+              "type": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "string"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              },
+              "values": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "items": {
+                      "type": "string"
+                    },
+                    "type": "array"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              }
+            },
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    "warnings": {
+      "anyOf": [
+        {
+          "items": {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          "type": "array"
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "null"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  },
+  "type": "object"
+}

First observedAug 4, 2026

TDQS

A4.7/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations only declare readOnlyHint=true, but the description adds several traits beyond that: answers come from a single resolver vantage point, the tool reads records only and never connects to the host, and it is anonymous with per-IP rate limiting. These are exactly the operational constraints an agent needs before calling.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences, each load-bearing: what it returns, which vantage point it represents plus the alternative, and the safety/rate-limit profile. No repetition of the title or schema, and the core capability is front-loaded.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Even though an output schema exists, the description still summarizes the return shape (each record type with values and per-type errors) and covers the single parameter, the alternative tool, and access constraints. Nothing an agent needs to invoke this correctly is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is only one parameter and schema coverage is 100%, with the schema itself supplying an example domain. The description adds no syntax, validation, or format detail beyond what the schema already provides, so this sits at the documented baseline.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Resolve a domain's DNS records') and enumerates the record types covered, so the agent knows exactly what comes back. It also distinguishes itself from the overlapping sibling mx_lookup/dns_propagation family by naming dns_propagation as the multi-vantage alternative.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly routes the agent: use dns_propagation 'to see whether the answer is already the same everywhere,' implying this tool is the single-vantage-point default. Combined with the scoping note that this is one resolver's answer, the when-to-use vs when-to-use-the-alternative decision is fully covered.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Uptimeify tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?