Tronsave MCP Testnet

Generate API Key

tronsave_generate_api_key

Destructive

Generate a new internal API key credential for the current user. Returns data containing the issued key — store it securely and pass it to tronsave_login (apiKey mode) for internal-tool access. Side effect: issues secret material; not idempotent — each call mints a fresh key. If a previous key existed, treat it as rotated and stop using the old key once the new one is wired up. Requires a signature session and mcp-session-id. Sensitive output — never log raw keys; unauthorized sessions or policy checks may reject issuance.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
No arguments

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema

Name	Required	Description
`code`	Yes	GraphQL mutation status code (HTTP-like; `0`/`200` indicates success). Always pair with `success` for routing.
`data`	Yes	For `generateApiKey`: the freshly issued internal API key — treat as SECRET, store securely. For `revokeApiKey`: server-defined confirmation string (no key material).
`message`	Yes	Human-readable status text. Populated even on success; localized error messages may appear here on failure.
`success`	Yes	Whether the mutation succeeded at the backend level. Always check this before reading `data`.

TDQS

A4.6/5.0

Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Describes side effect of issuing secret material, non-idempotent behavior, key rotation implications, prerequisites (signature session, mcp-session-id), and security warnings (never log raw keys, unauthorized rejection). Adds significant value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Multiple sentences but each adds value; front-loaded with primary action. Could be slightly shorter, but no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Fully covers purpose, usage, side effects, security, and integration with other tools. No output schema needed as description explains return value. Complete for a parameterless tool with good annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in input schema, so description need not add parameter details. Baseline 4 applies as there is nothing to explain.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool generates a new internal API key credential for the current user, specifying the output format and usage context. Distinguishes itself from sibling tools like tronsave_revoke_api_key by describing its purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on storing the key securely, passing it to tronsave_login, and notes that it rotates old keys. Lacks explicit when-to-use vs alternatives, but gives actionable context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All Tronsave MCP Testnet tools Inspect

Try in Browser

RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A3.8/5.0

Disambiguation2/5

Several tools have overlapping purposes, such as multiple order creation tools (tronsave_create_order, tronsave_internal_order_create, tronsave_internal_create_extend_request) and multiple estimation tools (tronsave_estimate_buy_resource, tronsave_get_min_price, tronsave_internal_order_estimate). This would confuse an agent trying to select the correct tool.

Naming Consistency3/5

Tools follow a tronsave_verb_noun pattern with snake_case, but verbs are inconsistent (e.g., list vs get, create vs register) and the internal_ prefix creates two distinct naming styles. Some tools like tronsave_internal_order_book and tronsave_list_order_books are confusingly similar.

Tool Count2/5

29 tools is excessive for a server focused on a single market. Many tools duplicate functionality for internal vs signature authentication, bloating the surface. A more streamlined set (e.g., 10-15) would be more appropriate.

Completeness3/5

The tool set covers core operations like CRUD for orders, account info, and auto-settings. However, there are gaps: no explicit delete for auto-sell settings, and manual sell is the only sell option. Some internal tools appear redundant, but overall coverage is adequate.

Resources

Need Help?