Skip to main content
Glama

Get Deposit Address

tronsave_get_deposit_address
Read-onlyIdempotent

Fetches the specific deposit address for the TronSave internal account. Requires a logged-in MCP session created by the tronsave_login tool: include mcp-session-id: <sessionId> returned by tronsave_login on subsequent MCP requests. Internal tools never accept API keys via tool arguments; signature sessions resolve the latest internal API key on demand, while api-key sessions reuse the validated key from login. Trigger this tool if the user asks for a deposit address or needs to top up their TronSave TRX balance. Constraints: 1) TRX only; 2) Minimum deposit amount is 10 TRX; 3) Read-only operation.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountTrxYesAmount of TRX to deposit

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountTrxYesAmount of TRX to deposit
depositAddressYesTRON base58 deposit address, used for deposit TRX to TronSave internal account

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint. The description adds crucial context: session requirements, auth mode resolution, and constraints (TRX only, min 10 TRX, read-only). No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is front-loaded with purpose, then session requirements, then constraints. Slightly verbose with full auth mode explanation, but all information is relevant and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-parameter tool with output schema (implied), the description covers purpose, preconditions, constraints, and safety profile completely. No missing critical context given existing annotations and schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% and the parameter (amountTrx) is well-documented with type, minimum, and description. The tool description repeats the min deposit (10 TRX) but adds no new semantic nuance beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Fetches the specific deposit address for the TronSave internal account,' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools (none others fetch deposit addresses) and adds constraints (TRX only, min 10 TRX).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly states the prerequisite of a logged-in session via tronsave_login, provides the required session header format, and explains when to trigger ('if the user asks for a deposit address or needs to top up'). Also clarifies auth modes.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

TDQS

A4.4/5.0
Disambiguation4/5

Most tools have clearly distinct purposes, with some overlap between signature-based and internal API-based variants (e.g., create_order vs internal_order_create). Descriptions are thorough and help disambiguate. The minor overlap is justified by different authentication methods.

Naming Consistency5/5

Tool names follow a consistent 'tronsave_verb_noun' pattern with clear segmentation (e.g., get/list for retrieval, create/update/cancel for mutations). Internal tools use a consistent 'internal_' prefix. No mixing of conventions.

Tool Count4/5

29 tools is on the higher end but appropriate for a DeFi platform covering multiple resource types, order management, auto-settings, internal accounts, extensions, and authentication. A few tools could be merged (e.g., estimate variants) but overall scope justifies the count.

Completeness3/5

Major operations (CRUD for orders, auto-sell settings, internal account) are covered. Notable gaps include missing create/update tools for auto-buy rules (only delete exists) and limited history for signature-based orders (only internal order history available).

Resources