square_feet_to_square_meters
Convert square feet to square meters.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| square_feet | Yes | Area in square feet |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| square_feet | Yes | ||
| square_meters | Yes |
Convert square feet to square meters.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| square_feet | Yes | Area in square feet |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| square_feet | Yes | ||
| square_meters | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations, but the description implies a simple, safe mathematical conversion with no side effects. Adequate given the tool's straightforward nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded, no wasted words. Perfectly concise for a simple conversion tool.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With one parameter and output schema present, the description fully covers necessary context. No missing information for this simple tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% and parameter 'square_feet' is described as 'Area in square feet' in schema. Description adds no additional meaning, so baseline 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states conversion from square feet to square meters with specific verb+resource. Distinguishes from sibling tools like 'square_meters_to_square_feet' and 'feet_to_meters'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No explicit guidance on when to use vs alternatives, but the purpose is obvious for unit conversion. Lacks when-not-to-use context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.