pounds_to_kilograms
Convert pounds to kilograms.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | Weight in pounds |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | ||
| kilograms | Yes |
Convert pounds to kilograms.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | Weight in pounds |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | ||
| kilograms | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Simple mathematical operation with no side effects; description is clear enough, though no mention of precision or return format. Output schema likely handles return details.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise single sentence, no waste, front-loaded with the essential purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity, one parameter, full schema coverage, and presence of an output schema, the description is fully adequate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description covers the parameter fully (100% coverage), so the description adds no extra semantic value beyond what the schema already provides.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the action (convert) and resources (pounds to kilograms), distinguishing it from the sibling 'kilograms_to_pounds'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage for weight conversion, but no explicit guidance on when to use versus other conversion tools or any exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.