mph_to_kph
Convert miles per hour to kilometers per hour.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mph | Yes | Speed in miles per hour |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| kph | Yes | ||
| mph | Yes |
Convert miles per hour to kilometers per hour.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mph | Yes | Speed in miles per hour |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| kph | Yes | ||
| mph | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It describes a straightforward conversion, which is implicit behavior. However, it doesn't explicitly state that it is a deterministic, read-only operation or any potential edge cases.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One sentence of 9 words, no redundancy. Perfectly concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple; description fully explains the operation. Output schema exists to clarify return value. Missing minor context like that it returns a numeric value in kph.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (one parameter 'mph' with description 'Speed in miles per hour'). The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description states 'Convert miles per hour to kilometers per hour' – a clear verb and resource. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'kph_to_mph' which performs the reverse conversion.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., kph_to_mph, knots_to_kph). The description only states what it does without context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.