min_value
Find minimum value.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| numbers | Yes | Comma-separated numbers |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| min | No | ||
| code | No | ||
| error | No | ||
| index | No | ||
| numbers | No |
Find minimum value.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| numbers | Yes | Comma-separated numbers |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| min | No | ||
| code | No | ||
| error | No | ||
| index | No | ||
| numbers | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
Output schema / $defs / MinResponseRemoved value: -{
- "properties": {
- "code": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Code"
- },
- "error": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Error"
- },
- "index": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "integer"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Index"
- },
- "min": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "number"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Min"
- },
- "numbers": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "items": {
- "type": "number"
- },
- "type": "array"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Numbers"
- }
- },
- "title": "MinResponse",
- "type": "object"
-}Output schema / $defs / app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponseAdded value: +{
+ "properties": {
+ "code": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Code"
+ },
+ "error": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Error"
+ },
+ "index": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "integer"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Index"
+ },
+ "min": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Min"
+ },
+ "numbers": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "items": {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ "type": "array"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Numbers"
+ }
+ },
+ "title": "MinResponse",
+ "type": "object"
+}Output schema / x-fastmcp-top-level-schemaPrevious value: -"MinResponse"New value: +"app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponse"Output schema / $defs / MinResponseAdded value: +{
+ "properties": {
+ "code": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Code"
+ },
+ "error": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Error"
+ },
+ "index": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "integer"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Index"
+ },
+ "min": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Min"
+ },
+ "numbers": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "items": {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ "type": "array"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Numbers"
+ }
+ },
+ "title": "MinResponse",
+ "type": "object"
+}Output schema / $defs / app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponseRemoved value: -{
- "properties": {
- "code": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Code"
- },
- "error": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Error"
- },
- "index": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "integer"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Index"
- },
- "min": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "number"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Min"
- },
- "numbers": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "items": {
- "type": "number"
- },
- "type": "array"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Numbers"
- }
- },
- "title": "MinResponse",
- "type": "object"
-}Output schema / x-fastmcp-top-level-schemaPrevious value: -"app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponse"New value: +"MinResponse"Output schema / $defs / MinResponseRemoved value: -{
- "properties": {
- "code": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Code"
- },
- "error": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Error"
- },
- "index": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "integer"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Index"
- },
- "min": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "type": "number"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Min"
- },
- "numbers": {
- "anyOf": [
- {
- "items": {
- "type": "number"
- },
- "type": "array"
- },
- {
- "type": "null"
- }
- ],
- "title": "Numbers"
- }
- },
- "title": "MinResponse",
- "type": "object"
-}Output schema / $defs / app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponseAdded value: +{
+ "properties": {
+ "code": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Code"
+ },
+ "error": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "string"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Error"
+ },
+ "index": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "integer"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Index"
+ },
+ "min": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Min"
+ },
+ "numbers": {
+ "anyOf": [
+ {
+ "items": {
+ "type": "number"
+ },
+ "type": "array"
+ },
+ {
+ "type": "null"
+ }
+ ],
+ "title": "Numbers"
+ }
+ },
+ "title": "MinResponse",
+ "type": "object"
+}Output schema / x-fastmcp-top-level-schemaPrevious value: -"MinResponse"New value: +"app__routers__misc_utils__MinResponse"Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations are absent, so the description must carry behavioral disclosure. It states the core behavior—computing the minimum—but does not mention edge cases such as empty input, malformed numbers, or non-numeric entries, nor does it clarify the return semantics beyond what the output schema likely provides.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is three words long, front-loads the action, and contains no filler. It is maximally concise for the operation it describes.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a single-parameter aggregation tool with an output schema, the description is nearly complete. It falls short only by omitting sibling disambiguation and edge-case behavior.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100%: the only parameter is documented as 'Comma-separated numbers'. The description adds no extra parameter-level meaning, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a clear verb+object construction ('Find minimum value') and is consistent with the tool name. However, it doesn't distinguish this tool from near-twin siblings like 'minimum', so an agent cannot tell which variant to choose without more context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No when-to-use guidance, prerequisites, or alternative tools are mentioned. With siblings such as 'minimum', 'max_value', and 'maximum', the description leaves the selection decision entirely to inference.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.
Many tools have overlapping purposes, such as multiple random generators (random_integer, random_number), duplicate hashing functions (hash_md5, md5_checksum), and near-identical tools (compare, compare_2, compare_decimals). The sheer number of tools and lack of clear boundaries make it difficult for an agent to differentiate.
Naming is highly inconsistent. There are duplicate tools with different names (camel_case vs to_camel_case, slug vs slugify), arbitrary suffixes like '_2', and mixing of patterns (e.g., generate_password vs password_entropy). No clear convention is followed.
With 572 tools, the server is massively overpopulated for any coherent purpose. It includes trivial endpoints (true_endpoint, null, hello_world) and numerous duplicates, far exceeding a well-scoped utility set.
While the server covers many domains (math, strings, dates, colors, etc.), the presence of duplicate and trivial tools indicates a lack of thoughtful curation. There are gaps in basic operations (e.g., no dedicated file or network tools), and many tools are redundant.