kilograms_to_pounds
Convert kilograms to pounds.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| kilograms | Yes | Weight in kilograms |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | ||
| kilograms | Yes |
Convert kilograms to pounds.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| kilograms | Yes | Weight in kilograms |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| pounds | Yes | ||
| kilograms | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and description lacks any behavioral details (e.g., rounding, precision, error handling). For a simple conversion, basic transparency is missing.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no unnecessary words. Efficient and to the point.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given one parameter and output schema exists, description is nearly complete. Could mention output format (pounds as number) but not essential due to output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter description already in schema. Description adds no additional semantics, so baseline score of 3 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Convert kilograms to pounds' with specific verb and resource, distinguishing it from reverse tool 'pounds_to_kilograms' and other unit converters.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'pounds_to_kilograms' or other weight converters. Does not mention context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.