gallons_uk_to_liters
Convert UK gallons to liters.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gallons | Yes | Volume in UK gallons |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| liters | Yes | ||
| gallons_uk | Yes |
Convert UK gallons to liters.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| gallons | Yes | Volume in UK gallons |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| liters | Yes | ||
| gallons_uk | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations are absent, so description should disclose behavioral traits. It only states the conversion without mentioning any edge cases, precision, or potential limitations.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence conveying the core function with no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple with one parameter and an output schema exists. Description is minimal but sufficient for a trivial conversion, though it could mention the conversion factor.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for the single parameter 'gallons'. Description adds no further meaning beyond the schema's own description.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states the verb 'Convert' and the specific resource 'UK gallons to liters'. Distinguishes from sibling gallons_us_to_liters by specifying UK.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus the sibling gallons_us_to_liters. No context for prerequisites or alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.