decimal_to_octal
Convert decimal to octal.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | Yes | Decimal number |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| octal | Yes | ||
| decimal | Yes |
Convert decimal to octal.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| number | Yes | Decimal number |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| octal | Yes | ||
| decimal | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It does not disclose output format, edge cases (negative numbers, large values), or any constraints. A single sentence is insufficient for behavioral transparency.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise with one sentence. It is front-loaded and contains no fluff. However, it could be slightly more descriptive without losing conciseness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool's simplicity (one parameter) and the existence of an output schema, the description is minimally adequate. It lacks mention of return type or edge cases, but the core conversion is clear.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 100% (parameter 'number' described as 'Decimal number'). The tool description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, so a baseline of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Convert decimal to octal.' clearly specifies the verb 'Convert' and the resource 'decimal to octal'. It distinguishes this tool from siblings like decimal_to_binary and decimal_to_hexadecimal.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives or when not to use it. The description only states the conversion operation.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.