cups_to_milliliters
Convert US cups to milliliters.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cups | Yes | Volume in cups (US) |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cups_us | Yes | ||
| milliliters | Yes |
Convert US cups to milliliters.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cups | Yes | Volume in cups (US) |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| cups_us | Yes | ||
| milliliters | Yes |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the conversion direction, such as rounding, precision, or handling of edge cases. The description adds no value beyond the name.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Perfectly concise for the tool's simplicity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple unit conversion with one parameter and an output schema expected, the description is adequate but could mention precision or that it handles decimal values.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with parameter 'cups' already described as 'Volume in cups (US)'. Description adds no additional meaning beyond schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description uses specific verb 'Convert' and clearly specifies resource 'US cups to milliliters', distinguishing it from sibling conversion tools like milliliters_to_cups.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Usage context is implied but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives provided. The description is minimal, relying on the tool name for guidance.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.