TheySaid

Theme detail

theme_detail

Read-onlyIdempotent

Drill into ONE theme of a project: its summary, sentiment, strategic recommendations, how many responses mention it, its friction (category, severityCounts = responses per friction severity Mild < Moderate < Severe < Blocking, and impact = how widespread the observation is, when the theme is a friction, i.e. a negative project-wide observation; null otherwise), and verbatim respondent quotes with share ids + public shareUrls to cite. Optional since/until limit the response count and quotes to quotes sent in that window (a report run defaults to its own window). Resolve theme ids via list_observations or project_overview. In a report run a short description replaces the summary, recommendations are left out (list_observations has them) and quotes carry only their citation ids.

Input Schema

Name	Required	Description
`since`	No	ISO date — only responses on/after this count and are quoted, or null.
`until`	No	ISO date — only responses on/before this count and are quoted, or null.
`themeId`	Yes	The theme id (from project_overview.themes).
`projectId`	Yes	The project the theme belongs to.

Output Schema

Name	Required	Description	Default
`error`	No
`theme`	No
`friction`	No
`citations`	No
`recommendations`	No

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

Changed2 schema fields changedNov 3, 2026

changedOutput schema / properties / citations / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "items": {
-      "additionalProperties": false,
-      "properties": {
-        "insightId": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "messageId": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "questionId": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "quote": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "shareId": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        },
-        "summaryTitle": {
-          "anyOf": [
-            {
-              "type": "string"
-            },
-            {
-              "type": "null"
-            }
-          ]
-        }
-      },
-      "type": "object"
-    },
-    "type": "array"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "items": {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "insightId": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "messageId": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "questionId": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "quote": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "shareId": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "shareUrl": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "summaryTitle": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    "type": "array"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

changedOutput schema / properties / friction / anyOf

Previous value: -[
-  {
-    "additionalProperties": false,
-    "properties": {
-      "category": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      },
-      "impact": {
-        "anyOf": [
-          {
-            "type": "string"
-          },
-          {
-            "type": "null"
-          }
-        ]
-      }
-    },
-    "type": "object"
-  },
-  {
-    "type": "null"
-  }
-]New value: +[
+  {
+    "additionalProperties": false,
+    "properties": {
+      "category": {
+        "anyOf": [
+          {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "type": "null"
+          }
+        ]
+      },
+      "impact": {
+        "anyOf": [
+          {
+            "type": "string"
+          },
+          {
+            "type": "null"
+          }
+        ]
+      },
+      "severityCounts": {
+        "anyOf": [
+          {
+            "additionalProperties": false,
+            "properties": {
+              "Blocking": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "number"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              },
+              "Mild": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "number"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              },
+              "Moderate": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "number"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              },
+              "Severe": {
+                "anyOf": [
+                  {
+                    "type": "number"
+                  },
+                  {
+                    "type": "null"
+                  }
+                ]
+              }
+            },
+            "type": "object"
+          },
+          {
+            "type": "null"
+          }
+        ]
+      }
+    },
+    "type": "object"
+  },
+  {
+    "type": "null"
+  }
+]

Changed3 schema fields changedOct 26, 2026

addedInput schema / properties / since

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "ISO date — only responses on/after this count and are quoted, or null."
+}

addedInput schema / properties / until

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "type": "string"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ],
+  "description": "ISO date — only responses on/before this count and are quoted, or null."
+}

addedOutput schema / properties / friction

Added value: +{
+  "anyOf": [
+    {
+      "additionalProperties": false,
+      "properties": {
+        "category": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        },
+        "impact": {
+          "anyOf": [
+            {
+              "type": "string"
+            },
+            {
+              "type": "null"
+            }
+          ]
+        }
+      },
+      "type": "object"
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "null"
+    }
+  ]
+}

First observedOct 16, 2026

TDQS

A4.3/5.0

Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnly/idempotent/non-destructive, so safety is covered; the description adds real behavioral detail on top: the since/until window filters both counts and quotes, a report run defaults to its own window and degrades the payload, and friction is null when the theme is not a negative project-wide observation. The severity ordering (Mild < Moderate < Severe < Blocking) clarifies a non-obvious data shape, though quote volume/limits and pagination are not addressed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Front-loads the core action and then enumerates payload fields, with the id-resolution hint and report-run caveat placed at the end where they belong. It is dense—long parentheticals for severityCounts and impact—but essentially every clause adds information rather than restating the name.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

An output schema exists, yet the description still explains the friction and quote structure and the report-run degradation, which is exactly the kind of deltas an agent needs. Remaining gaps are minor: no statement of quote volume limits or behavior when a theme has zero quotes/friction.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3, but the description adds genuine meaning: since/until constrain both the response count and which quotes appear, and a report run substitutes its own window for the default. That is contextual behavior the schema's one-line ISO date notes do not convey.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource ('Drill into ONE theme of a project') and enumerates exactly what comes back: summary, sentiment, recommendations, mention counts, friction with severityCounts/impact, and verbatim quotes with share ids/URLs. It also distinguishes itself from siblings by naming list_observations and project_overview as id resolvers rather than substitutes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives concrete routing guidance: 'Resolve theme ids via list_observations or project_overview', and explains the report-run variant where the summary shrinks and recommendations are omitted because list_observations carries them. It does not explicitly state when to prefer project_overview over this tool in non-report contexts, so it stops just short of full when/when-not coverage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

All TheySaid tools Inspect

Try in Browser

One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources

Need Help?