Skip to main content
Glama

RTK Motion — Motion Capture, Biomechanics, Threat & Fleet Intelligence

get_spotter_cv

Geo-stripped commercial-truck image corpus for detection_or_ocr_model_training. 1877 de-identified crops, every one a verified truck (equipment=truck on all 1877). FMCSA-public identity labels (usdot + carrier) are resolved on 90 crops (4.8%) and null on the rest — treat them as a bonus, not the basis of the corpus. Returns labels (JSONL, one row per crop — no plate read, no geo, no timestamp) plus time-limited signed URLs to the de-identified truck crops (faces/persons + non-subject text + burned-in GPS blurred, and EVERY plate blurred including the subject truck's own; only painted carrier markings remain). Pay $50 USDC on Base (chain 8453, USDC 0x833589fCD6eDb6E08f4c7C32D4f71b54bdA02913) to RTK wallet 0x6C11F8a21f7ca922F483Ed21C3b6c2d9B305B10C; pass tx hash as payment_tx. Eth/Solana: /.well-known/x402. Images are paged — use offset to page through the corpus with the same payment_tx.

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
limitNoMax image URLs to return per call (default 500).
offsetNoImage offset for paging through the corpus (default 0).
quote_idNoRedeem this item from a negotiated quote you already paid with pay_quote (q_...). Use instead of payment_tx / x_payment: no further payment is taken.
x_paymentNoPreferred (x402 exact / gasless): base64 X-PAYMENT payload — a signed EIP-3009 transferWithAuthorization for this tool's USDC price to our wallet. Redeemable only by its signer; no gas needed.
payment_txNoUSDC transaction hash. Send $50 USDC on Base to 0x6C11F8a21f7ca922F483Ed21C3b6c2d9B305B10C, then pass tx hash here.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / quote_id
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Redeem this item from a negotiated quote you already paid with pay_quote (q_...). Use instead of payment_tx / x_payment: no further payment is taken.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  2. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / x_payment
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Preferred (x402 exact / gasless): base64 X-PAYMENT payload — a signed EIP-3009 transferWithAuthorization for this tool's USDC price to our wallet. Redeemable only by its signer; no gas needed.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  3. Added

TDQS

A3.9/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well: it discloses exact privacy transforms (faces/persons, non-subject text, burned-in GPS blurred; every plate blurred including the subject truck's own), that payments are time-limited signed URLs, that 95.2% of identity labels are null, and that x_payment is the preferred gasless x402 path. Gaps: URL expiry duration is only called 'time-limited', and no failure behavior (wrong amount, reused tx) is described.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Dense but front-loaded: corpus identity and composition first, then label caveat, then return payload, then payment, then paging. Every sentence carries information an agent needs to call it correctly; the long hex addresses are necessary, not filler.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema exists, so the description must explain returns — and it does (JSONL one row per crop with no plate/geo/timestamp, plus signed image URLs). Pricing, currency, chain, wallet and paging are all specified. Still missing signed-URL lifetime and the actual label fields, which matter for a paid bulk dataset.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3, but the description adds cross-call semantics not present in the schema — that offset paging reuses the same payment_tx rather than paying again, and that the tx must be $50 USDC on chain 8453 to a specific wallet. It also frames the alt-currency path via /.well-known/x402.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb/resource: returns a geo-stripped commercial-truck image corpus (1877 verified truck crops) with labels plus signed crop URLs. It is clearly distinguishable from catalog/bundle siblings, but it never names its closest siblings (get_spotter_cv_sample, get_spotter_cv_profile, get_spotter_carrier) so the boundary is inferred rather than stated.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Gives substantive operational guidance — pay $50 USDC on Base, then page with offset and the same payment_tx, and treat identity labels as a bonus. However, it never says when to pick this full corpus over the sample/profile siblings, so selection against alternatives is left implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.