Skip to main content
Glama

Real Estate Analyzer

Analyze a real-estate deal

analyze_deal

Underwrite a real-estate investment deal and get a 0-100 score, verdict, cash flow, cap rate, DSCR, stress tests, break-even thresholds, and a shareable report link. Strategies: ltr (long-term rental), str (short-term rental), brrr, multifamily, flip (fix-n-flip), newc (new construction). All rates/percents are FRACTIONS (0.0675 = 6.75%). Omitted operating inputs are filled with documented defaults and listed in assumptions.estimated_fields. Output is a software estimate, not financial, investment, tax or legal advice — figures are projections to verify, not recommendations. Free, no key; the response includes a shareable report_url.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputsYesDeal inputs in camelCase engine keys. Anything omitted gets a documented default, listed back under assumptions.estimated_fields. Minimum: price + the strategy's income driver (marketRent / adr+occupancy / units / arv / land+build). Call list_strategies for the full per-strategy schema.
strategyYesInvestment strategy to analyze.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
scoreYes0-100 deal score.
leversNoTop input changes that would each add ~$1,000/yr cash flow (STR).
stressNoStress scenarios, each with a verdict.
metricsYesHeadline metrics for this strategy.
summaryYesDeterministic one-paragraph summary.
upfrontNoCash-into-the-deal / project-cost stack rows {label, amount, kind}.
verdictYesStrong (85+) / Solid (70+) / Workable (50+) / Risky (25+) / Run Away.
strategyYes
breakdownNoOrdered cash-flow / profit waterfall rows {label, amount, kind}; outflows are negative.
data_noteNoREIzer data tools that can refine this analysis (needs an API key).
disclaimerNoNot financial advice — software estimate only.
report_urlNoShareable public report page (30 days).
thresholdsNo
assumptionsNoestimated_fields lists every input REIzer defaulted.
inputs_usedNoThe resolved input set the analysis ran on — caller values plus documented defaults.
sensitivityNoWhich input drivers move the result most — {driver, range, low_impact, high_impact, swing}, sorted by swing (STR).

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changed
    • changedOutput schema / properties / verdict / description
      Previous value: -"Strong / Solid / Thin / Weak."New value: +"Strong (85+) / Solid (70+) / Workable (50+) / Risky (25+) / Run Away."
  2. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / breakdown
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Ordered cash-flow / profit waterfall rows {label, amount, kind}; outflows are negative.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / levers
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Top input changes that would each add ~$1,000/yr cash flow (STR).",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / sensitivity
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Which input drivers move the result most — {driver, range, low_impact, high_impact, swing}, sorted by swing (STR).",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
    • addedOutput schema / properties / upfront
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Cash-into-the-deal / project-cost stack rows {label, amount, kind}.",
      +  "items": {
      +    "additionalProperties": true,
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "type": "array"
      +}
  3. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / inputs_used
      Added value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "description": "The resolved input set the analysis ran on — caller values plus documented defaults.",
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  4. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / data_note
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "REIzer data tools that can refine this analysis (needs an API key).",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  5. Changed1 schema field changed
    • addedOutput schema / properties / disclaimer
      Added value: +{
      +  "description": "Not financial advice — software estimate only.",
      +  "type": "string"
      +}
  6. Changed4 schema fields changed
    • addedInput schema / properties / inputs / additionalProperties
      Added value: +true
    • changedInput schema / properties / inputs / description
      Previous value: -"Deal inputs (camelCase engine keys — call list_strategies for each strategy's schema). Minimum: price + the income driver (marketRent / adr+occupancy / units / arv / land+build)."New value: +"Deal inputs in camelCase engine keys. Anything omitted gets a documented default, listed back under assumptions.estimated_fields. Minimum: price + the strategy's income driver (marketRent / adr+occupancy / units / arv / land+build). Call list_strategies for the full per-strategy schema."
    • addedInput schema / properties / inputs / properties
      Added value: +{
      +  "adr": {
      +    "description": "Average nightly rate in dollars. Required for str.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "arv": {
      +    "description": "After-repair value in dollars. Required for brrr and flip.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "btsArv": {
      +    "description": "Finished build-to-sell value in dollars. Required for newc.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "buildPsf": {
      +    "description": "Build cost per square foot in dollars. Required for newc.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "downPct": {
      +    "description": "Down payment. Expressed as a FRACTION (0.0675 = 6.75%), never a percent. Optional — a documented default applies.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "insurance": {
      +    "description": "Annual insurance in dollars. Optional.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "landPrice": {
      +    "description": "Land acquisition cost in dollars. Required for newc.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "livingSqft": {
      +    "description": "Heated living area in square feet. Required for newc.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "marketRent": {
      +    "description": "Expected monthly rent in dollars. Required for ltr and brrr.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "occupancy": {
      +    "description": "Expected occupancy. Expressed as a FRACTION (0.0675 = 6.75%), never a percent. Required for str.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "price": {
      +    "description": "Purchase price in dollars. Required for every strategy except newc.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "rate": {
      +    "description": "Annual interest rate. Expressed as a FRACTION (0.0675 = 6.75%), never a percent. Optional.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "rehabBudget": {
      +    "description": "Renovation budget in dollars. Required for brrr and flip.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "taxes": {
      +    "description": "Annual property taxes in dollars. Optional.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "term": {
      +    "description": "Loan term in years. Optional.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  },
      +  "units": {
      +    "description": "Multifamily rent roll — {unitCount, avgRent, marketRent?} or an array of unit objects. Required for multifamily.",
      +    "type": "object"
      +  },
      +  "vacancyPct": {
      +    "description": "Vacancy allowance. Expressed as a FRACTION (0.0675 = 6.75%), never a percent. Optional.",
      +    "type": "number"
      +  }
      +}
    • changedOutput schema / (root)
      Previous value: -nullNew value: +{
      +  "additionalProperties": true,
      +  "properties": {
      +    "assumptions": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "description": "estimated_fields lists every input REIzer defaulted.",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "metrics": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "description": "Headline metrics for this strategy.",
      +      "type": "object"
      +    },
      +    "report_url": {
      +      "description": "Shareable public report page (30 days).",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "score": {
      +      "description": "0-100 deal score.",
      +      "type": "number"
      +    },
      +    "strategy": {
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "stress": {
      +      "description": "Stress scenarios, each with a verdict.",
      +      "items": {
      +        "additionalProperties": true,
      +        "type": "object"
      +      },
      +      "type": "array"
      +    },
      +    "summary": {
      +      "description": "Deterministic one-paragraph summary.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    },
      +    "thresholds": {
      +      "additionalProperties": true,
      +      "type": [
      +        "object",
      +        "null"
      +      ]
      +    },
      +    "verdict": {
      +      "description": "Strong / Solid / Thin / Weak.",
      +      "type": "string"
      +    }
      +  },
      +  "required": [
      +    "strategy",
      +    "score",
      +    "verdict",
      +    "metrics",
      +    "summary"
      +  ],
      +  "type": "object"
      +}
  7. First observed

TDQS

A4.6/5.0
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds substantial behavior beyond the annotations: all rates/percents must be fractions, omitted inputs get documented defaults listed in assumptions.estimated_fields, the output is a non-advisory software estimate, and the tool is free with no key. Nothing contradicts the annotations; this is strong operational transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense but front-loaded with the core outcome, then strategy list, then critical usage warnings. Every sentence earns its place; it is only slightly long because of the detailed output list and disclaimer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with nested inputs, a six-value enum, and an output schema, the description plus structured schema covers strategy selection, fraction semantics, defaults, report_url behavior, and the disclaimer. An agent has everything needed to call it correctly without requiring the description to restate return-value details already present in the output schema.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3; the description adds global semantic value by emphasizing the fraction convention for rates/percents and explaining the default-filling behavior for omitted inputs. This reinforces the per-field schema notes rather than merely repeating them.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a precise verb ('Underwrite') and a concrete resource ('real-estate investment deal'), then names the specific outputs: 0-100 score, verdict, cash flow, cap rate, DSCR, stress tests, break-even thresholds, and report URL. This makes it clearly distinct from siblings like list_strategies and solve_max_offer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives clear strategic context by enumerating all six strategies and the minimum input pattern, and it points agents to list_strategies for full schema details. It does not explicitly say when to prefer best_use or solve_max_offer over this tool, so it stops short of full alternative routing guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Try in Browser

Glama MCP Gateway

Add one secure layer between your agents and this server.

Resources